影音使团播放探索队最新专访强调冰山上伪造木结构不可能（5月6日消息）

资料库

昔日新闻

影音使团播放探索队最新专访
强调冰山上伪造木结构不可能
（5月6日消息）

时代论坛 / 2010年5月6日

影音使团「挪亚方舟国际事工」在官方网页（www.noahsarksearch.net/big5）上发布最新的探索队成员专访片段，反驳美国的方舟探索者、自由大学犹太学系教授Dr. Randall Price的指控（www.worldofthebible.com/news.htm）。

影音使团的回应主要指出，Price的指控全属「听闻」，探索队成员确曾实地探索，亲眼见过并接触有关木建构。而该处地势险要，天气恶劣，当地人不可能将巨型木材运上去再自行搭建「方舟」。

（www.christiantimes.org.hk，时代论坛每日快拍，2010.5.6）

舊回應5則

虞瑋倩 / 2010-05-07 01:33:11

影音使團不如回答兩個問題

為何在高山寒冷地明明不可能有蜘蛛網﹐ 個所謂“木結構”有蜘蛛網﹖
聖經話方舟內外都塗了松香 (pitch)﹐ 為何你們沒有化驗到有松香﹖

Hin / 2010-05-06 20:02:38

Another question for Mr. Lee

I am sure someone from MEDIA or friends of MEDIA must be reading this.

Since Mr. Lee was so confident and sounds so knowledgeable and logical as he challenges Dr. Price about his e-mail content, I would like to ask Mr. Lee to explain the following:

Since the present mount Ararat is a result of numerous volcanic activities, how can the Ark survive this volcanic activities and still remain there even with woods that were so fresh and new?

Yes, the freezing temperature can preserve wood but that is after the volcanic activities. the wood from the Ark must first survive after the volcanic activities before they can be preserved by the freezing temperature.

Logical Lee, please try to explain this before you drill on Dr. Price any further. I certainly welcome Mr. Yeung to join in and help.

Hin / 2010-05-06 18:55:28

Even if they are not telling lies

Even if what Mr. Lee said about six meter deep is true, does that represent it is Noah's Ark?

We need to take one step back and think whether it is possible at all to prove that they have found the Ark or we should ask how can they prove they have found the Ark?

Even with a piece of wood or a huge wall of wood that are 4800 years ago, does that prove it is the Ark? The most they can say is that it "might" be the Ark or as they said, it is 99.9% the Ark.

We don't know whether there are any large wooden structure there before doesn't mean that we know the wooden structure is the Ark for sure.

There are many obvious unanswered questions, for example, mount Ararat (the one that they went to) not even exist during the flood, it only came to existence after volcanic activities in that region (if I am wrong, correct me).

What they are doing is keep sucking money from the public to satisfy their own desire (of course they will say that they are doing this for God, they are risking their life for God, the most difficult part to this is that they themselves didn't even realize, this is very frightening).

What they are doing in this four video clips is to focus in attacking the credibility of Dr. Price, they didn't answer many other crucial and necessary questions but divert the reader's attention to another issue.

Mr. Lee may be a mountain climbing expert but that is it, am I right? What about Mr. Yeung, what about Mr. Yuen, what about Ms. Leung, what do they know about archaeology, what do they know about Turkey, what do they know about Mount Ararat? I even want to ask what do they know about integrity and honesty.

Please admit that what they claimed in 2004-5 is not true, please remove all DVD and books related to that claim.

Please be honest and show the public how much they have spend and get an external auditor to audit their statement and then release to the public.

Please explain to us why the wood in one part of the video is different from the other part of the video.

Please let us know the piece of wood that are dated 4800 years old is taken from which part of the video.

Please explain to us why are there web on the wood shown in the video.

Please....don't just focus on one tree and forget the forest. There are indeed a lot for you to answer. Love to see more video clips from Mr. Yeung and Mr. Lee, they seems to know so much and sounds like an expert! Answer the above, educate us who are so ignorant (we really had a hard time knowing and understanding what you are trying to do or prove).

虞瑋倩 / 2010-05-06 15:27:55

山上「巨型」木結構

佢地反反復復講「巨型」木結構﹑「巨型」木結構﹐ 於是就說因為山上天氣惡劣﹑地勢險要﹐ 係唔可以運送「巨型」木材上山。
但如果看清楚他們發佈的片段﹐ 你是看不到任何明顯跡象那是「巨型」木結構。片大部份是影人爬來爬去﹐ 然後 close up﹐ 沒有任何鏡頭好清楚顯示出一個「巨型」木結構。
Dr. Randall Price 指出﹐ 係一個當地人把木材運到山上山洞來做幾個空間而已﹐ 他都沒有說是什麼「巨型」木結構。

Hin / 2010-05-06 10:33:20

There are other questions waiting for them to answer

Besides the comments from Dr. Price, there are a lot of questions waiting for them to answer, such as:

1. Is their claim in 2004-2005 false?

2. Why are the wood so fresh and new in the video and seems to be different kind of wood in another session of the same video?

3. How come Mr. Yeung, Mr. Lee, Mr. Yuen and Ms. Leung only present in one part of the video but not the other part of the video?

4. Why are there web on the wood beams in the video?

5. How much they have given to the Turkish government and to Parasut and his party?

If they read all the comments, there are a lot more for them to answer.

资料库

昔日新闻

影音使团播放探索队最新专访
强调冰山上伪造木结构不可能
（5月6日消息）

舊回應5則

虞瑋倩 / 2010-05-07 01:33:11

Hin / 2010-05-06 20:02:38

Hin / 2010-05-06 18:55:28

虞瑋倩 / 2010-05-06 15:27:55

Hin / 2010-05-06 10:33:20

资料库

更多標籤

本报简介

联系我们

恩典時刻

立即訂閱

時代學堂

論壇書籍

教會活動預告

洛桑大會

奉獻

廣告

資料庫

友好連繫

资料库

昔日新闻

影音使团播放探索队最新专访强调冰山上伪造木结构不可能（5月6日消息）

舊回應5則

虞瑋倩 / 2010-05-07 01:33:11

Hin / 2010-05-06 20:02:38

Hin / 2010-05-06 18:55:28

虞瑋倩 / 2010-05-06 15:27:55

Hin / 2010-05-06 10:33:20

资料库

更多標籤

登記收取論壇電郵

影音使团播放探索队最新专访
强调冰山上伪造木结构不可能
（5月6日消息）