邝保罗大主教接受最新一期香港圣公会官方刊物《教声》访问，就早前普世圣公宗内逾千名保守派主教及信徒领袖在耶路撒冷召开「全球圣公宗前途会议」并议决在宗派内另组「圣公宗认信团契」提出批评。
邝保罗指出，不同意见者应通过对话解决问题，但保守派不但拒绝对话，更在十年一度的兰帕会议之前举行「前途会议」，对圣公宗造成严重伤害。他指保守派另组「主教长委员会」、「认信团契」及进行跨区牧养等，只会带来分化，并质疑保守派此举只是想「另起炉灶」，将圣公宗的领导核心转移到其他教省。
邝保罗又申明，香港圣公会反对美、加圣公会在普世圣公宗达成共识前自行祝圣同性恋主教以及为同性伴侣举行祝福礼，但他亦同样反对保守派在普世圣公宗达成共识前自行作出跨区牧养和另外成立架构的决定。他强烈认为各教省应尊重传统机制，借对话求同存异。
（www.christiantimes.org.hk，时代论坛每日快拍，2008.7.8）
虞大姊
我講緊的唔係妳和張先生呀!給沒有學養和思辯能力(或者意圖)的佚名Anonymous
你這種信徒﹐香港的教會太多了﹐一忽兒罵人net mob 而完全不舉證﹐指控人hate someone, 什麼 willing to twist their views in order to say negatively every time of that person
這裡的討論﹐包括我本人﹐已經算溫和客氣﹐張國棟等的言論如此冷靜﹐你都失控﹐我看你去 uwants 那些基督教論壇﹐你早已經要發神經了。
Low-level and silly! Low-level and silly! Low-level and silly???
Provocative, verbal and arrogant!
Double standard! You can not be contradicted!
Reply to the 3 posts below...
Some people just can not bear being criticized however sane and well-meaning those criticisms may be!!! They can not be contradicted!!!
1. What are the evidences that people are parts of a net mob? Are those who authored the 3 posts below then belong to the same net mob? Why are you so nervous about net mobs?
2. “…二千多年的教會歷史，又會進入一個新時代。” This statement can not be plainer and simpler. What was so wring in questioning the statement? How can YOU say it was being twisted?
3. “難道為了女性按牧的分歧就要分裂麼?” Who says this is the ONLY reason the conservatives chose to split from the liberals? Didn’t you see, even Cheung was saying that the conservative Anglicans had MORE than the above as their major concerns. Read what he said: "今年分裂聖公會的其實有兩個問題。一是有一些主教反對按立女主教，二是有一些主教（甚至教區）反對北美教區接納同性戀信徒為主教..." Do not hide behind a one-liner!
4. Another one-liner: “眼光短淺的人總覺得甚麼都不是大問題…” Now, be fair. What evidences do you have for saying this? Hey, did not our prolific Cheung also say the following: “恐怕這分裂是無可避免的了…” Is he then also 眼光短淺???
Double standard!!!
Forget those net mobs
They just hate someone. Because of that they are willing to twist their views in order to say negatively every time of that person. If they are talking to other people, they probably hold a different views (e.g., more concerned about the split). Now one of them even loves picking on just one sentence and making a big deal. Haven't they heard of 斷章取義?難道為了女性按牧的分歧就要分裂麼?
如題.無言.眼光短淺的人總覺得甚麼都不是大問題
如題.無言.二千多年的教會歷史，又會進入一個新時代??
"...二千多年的教會歷史，又會進入一個新時代??"
This is clearly an exaggeration. What new generation? I fail to see why what is happening to the Anglican Church should cause us to enter into a 新時代?
I concur with the earlier post. Not all splits are bad.
Splits are not all bad!
To an outside observer, the conservative faction of the Anglican church may be seen as causing splits and making troubles. However, if one traces the history of the current problems in the worldwide Anglican church - primarily doctrinal in nature - one will realize that the concerns of the conservatives have been repeatedly expressed and IGNORED by the liberal faction in the church.
To this author, the split is inevitable.
There is a limit to compromises. It takes courage to make a stand on issues.
Splits are not all bad!!!
更正
前帖第二句裡的「無法」應為「無意」。不便之處，敬請原諒。認同鄺主教
十分認同鄺主教對事情的看法。可惜的是，按國際教會新聞所示，那前途會議的人雖然口裡說無法搞分裂，但實際上他們已言之鑿鑿地說這個那個是異端或假教師。這樣言論，還有甚麼轉彎的餘地？恐怕這分裂是無可避免的了。二千多年的教會歷史，又會進入一個新時代。
