《基督日报》在其香港网页刊登启事，指于今日（四月一日）起解散顾问团，另编采人员名单亦作了变动，详参该报网页「关于我们」一栏。至于启事全文则如下：
过去年来香港《基督日报》顾问牧者们一直为本报提供属灵及其他在各方面的支持，本报在此深表感谢。然而近日本报发现顾问团中存有问题顾问，作出损害《基督日报》的行动。故本报决定于2008年4月1日临时解散顾问团，但本报的新闻服务将不受影响，敬请留意。
相关资讯：【《基督日报》事件专辑】
（www.christiantimes.org.hk，时代论坛每日快拍，2008.4.1）
真面目
睇吓《基督日報》嘅反應，就見其真面目！面臨所有假冒騙局被人證實踢爆，嘩！翻轉豬肚！
之前找的都是福音派名牧、大牧作顧問，而家又當人全部作魔鬼，話人害自己？是名牧大牧變得快？還是自己終於在照妖鏡前現形？
三個多月來，被人話異端如此大件事，唔好話機構，即是為個人清白，點都要公開澄清、伸之大寃！三個多月來，全無動靜，竟當無發生過！做戲你估0甘易咩？
而家又換翻個 Susanna Lam上場？個 Peter Mak又走咗去邊？陣前換將？註定大敗！
不過要認住呢班人，人名又改，機構名又改，大話任講，遲啲又做無間道呀！
Something fishy is going on...
...It needs to be watched.
The issue with GH is primarily "doctrinal". When this is not resolved, GH will have no future.
If GH wishes to "continue to serve" the Chinese Church, she has to face this squarely. To come out clearly and cleanly is the only way.
Sorry, Cheung, please remind me again.
Sorry, please remind me again! Thanks.
To Hin
Regarding your questions, there is something I can tell you. Remember what I said how to find me?What happened?
The report of investigation since the end of last year didn't appear as promised but the dissolving of the board came up instead. What happened? Where is the report?
If there are questionable advisors, they should just remove them but not by dissolving the whole board unless the whole board is against them. What happened?
I knew a few advisors in North America requested to have their names removed from the board but their names are still on the list. If they can update news within 24 hours, why can't they remove the names of those advisors who made such a request? What happened?
GH should clarify instead of causing more confusions. GH should provide answer instead of raising more questions for themselves.
