基督日報事件獨立調查團公佈與日韓教會聯繫進展（7月30日消息）

基督日報事件獨立調查團
公佈與日韓教會聯繫進展
（7月30日消息）

時代論壇 / 2008年7月30日

《基督日報》事件獨立調查團公佈最新的工作彙報，內容是調查團與日本及韓國的教會組織聯繫後的進展。彙報全文如下：

《基督日報》事件獨立調查團已於2008年6月20日公佈，獨立調查團將跟進及調查與《基督日報》、耶穌青年會、張大衛（或張在亨）牧師有關組織的關係、教義及發展。所有發現均會基於可核實的證據，並向公眾彙報。

目前，獨立調查團的成員包括余達心牧師、楊慶球牧師、陸輝牧師、郭文池牧師、張慕皚牧師、陳如炳牧師、梁廷益牧師、林以諾牧師、陳恩明牧師、羅錫為牧師、司徒永富博士、麥裕沛博士、召集人柯廣輝律師及程序顧問曾繁凱先生。范建強博士因健康理由，已經辭任獨立調查團成員的職務。

在獨立調查團成立以前，韓國基督教總聯合會曾就張大衛的信仰背景展開調查。在發表調查結果後，獨立調查團曾經與韓國基督教總聯合會，瞭解他們的調查所得。此外，獨立調查團亦曾聯絡日本異端防治及康復聯會的平岡正幸牧師，深入瞭解“k-notes”事件。

韓國基督教總聯合會對張大衛牧師展開的調查

韓國基督教總聯合會（Christian Council of Korea，簡稱CCK或韓基總）曾於2004年至2005年成立調查委員會，調查張大衛（或張在亨）牧師與統一教的關係，並於2006年作出議決。

韓基總調查委員會的成員，包括主席Hyung Taek PARK牧師、Sam Kyung CHAE牧師及Young Sik JIN牧師於2008年7月9日與獨立調查團會面，並表示韓基總調查委員會當時的結論是指張大衛在1997年以前與統一教有關連，卻未有證據顯示他在 1997年後與統一教有關連。然而他們澄清，這結論並非說明張大衛沒有異端思想。他們進一步強調，韓基總調查委員會的議決不應該用來證明張大衛與異端教義沒有關連。

日本異端防治及康復聯會平岡正幸牧師提供的資料

獨立調查團亦曾聯絡日本異端防治及康復聯會（Japan Society of Cult Prevention and Recovery）的平岡正幸牧師（Rev. Masayuki Hiraoka）。平岡牧師亦是JELC Koufu Church的牧師，曾從事統一教教義研究及調查工作一段長時間。

據平岡牧師所述，他曾輔導日本青年M. K.的父母。M. K.在2003年開始在Christian Today相關機構Belecom（即Verecom）工作。根據《基督日報》在2007年11月20日的聲明中引述的Christian Today報導，Christian Today是由張大衛創立的。

M. K.的父母曾因兒子的精神狀況有異，及有拖欠租金的行為，在2005至2006年間請平岡牧師為他們輔導。2006年10月，M. K.的父母在他居住的單位中發現M. K.的手寫筆記（k-notes）。平岡牧師分析k-notes中關於末世論及再來主的教導後，确定有關的教導為異端，帶有統一教的特徵。

獨立調查團已更新官方網站

獨立調查團已經更新其官方網站（www.enquirycommittee-ghi.org）。公眾可在上述網站參閱進一步的資料，包括韓基總調查委員會給獨立調查團的信件，與k-notes的手稿及中英文譯本。

（按：《基督日報》事件獨立調查團於2007年底成立後，隨即就《基督日報》、耶穌青年會（耶青）及張大衛（或張在亨）牧師的信仰背景展開調查。在本年4月發表的調查結果中，獨立調查團一致認為他們不能排除以下的高度可能性：耶青在中國內地的主要大學建立據點，有系統地提倡再來主等類似統一教的教義，並為此表示高度關注及深切憂慮。調查報告亦指耶青是由張大衛創立的，此外，《基督日報》的主要同工是耶青的會員。）

相關資訊：【《基督日報》事件專輯】

（www.christiantimes.org.hk，時代論壇每日快拍，2008.7.30）

舊回應21則

Hin / 2008-07-31 18:30:20

GH's ad pages and IC's new update

As I viewed the ad pages of GH in North America, they haven't change of their usual practise: didn't remove completely at the request of the church or organization; putting the link on without the knowledge or permission of the church or organization.

In the Canada's page: there are 3 organizations and 6 churches. For the 3 organizations, 2 of them actually belong to the same but they are 2 different ministries. Among the 6 churches, one told me that they didn't even know they are on and one is from the States.

In the American page: there are 7 organizations, among which 3 belong to Canadian side and among these 3, 1 of them has been removed from the Canadian side at the request of the organization but not from the American side. For churches, there are 16 of them, 5 of them are from the Canadian side and 1 of them has been removed from the Canadian side at the request of the church but not from the American side.

There is no ad page for Hong Kong and Australia but for Taiwan, the church and organizations are together on one page and have 18 of them without one single church on it. For churches and organizations who are on their web page, they need to be careful not being used by them as a reference. For those who knew these churches and organizations, we should remind and warn them.

In the recent report, it is important to see some of the evidence regarding the doctrine of this "network". In Christian Times' report, it is also important to note the last two statements:

調查報告亦指耶青是由張大衛創立的，此外，《基督日報》的主要同工是耶青的會員。

YD is found by David Jiang, the two YD's leaders from China never mentioned that in their "press conference", why hidden from the public? If I am the founder of an organization, I think it is OK and suitable and appropriate to mention me as the founder unless there is something wrong with me. The question is why do they hide this from the public?

Secondly, most of the key people in GH are YDs. I think this is not coincidence but planned strategy or arrangement. They belong to the same network or using the same platform. If YD is a good organization as they claimed and if I am a member of YD, I will by all means listed that as my background right from the beginning. They should know that very well as they are using many organizations and churches as their reference by linking to their webpages.

Another key statement is:

耶青在中國內地的主要大學建立據點，有系統地提倡再來主等類似統一教的教義.

I think this is a crucial statement besides their poor practise and hidden truths between David Jiang, YD and GH. If they are teaching similar doctrines as Unification church, even David Jiang is no longer involved with UC (I mean "even", the report only said that there is no evidence but doesn't mean no involvement), it is still a key issue that Christian can't accept no matter how well they report the news of what is happening in the Christian world.

No matter how they put a nice front to the public on their website, no matter how biblical their faith statement is, there are still a lot of problems with them, a lot of unanswered questions about them and unacceptable facts about them.

資料庫 > 專輯 > 《基督日報》事件專輯

報道