《基督日報》在其香港網頁刊登啟事，指於今日（四月一日）起解散顧問團，另編採人員名單亦作了變動，詳參該報網頁「關於我們」一欄。至於啟事全文則如下：
過去年來香港《基督日報》顧問牧者們一直為本報提供屬靈及其他在各方面的支持，本報在此深表感謝。然而近日本報發現顧問團中存有問題顧問，作出損害《基督日報》的行動。故本報決定於2008年4月1日臨時解散顧問團，但本報的新聞服務將不受影響，敬請留意。
相關資訊：【《基督日報》事件專輯】
（www.christiantimes.org.hk，時代論壇每日快拍，2008.4.1）
真面目
睇吓《基督日報》嘅反應，就見其真面目！面臨所有假冒騙局被人證實踢爆，嘩！翻轉豬肚！
之前找的都是福音派名牧、大牧作顧問，而家又當人全部作魔鬼，話人害自己？是名牧大牧變得快？還是自己終於在照妖鏡前現形？
三個多月來，被人話異端如此大件事，唔好話機構，即是為個人清白，點都要公開澄清、伸之大寃！三個多月來，全無動靜，竟當無發生過！做戲你估0甘易咩？
而家又換翻個 Susanna Lam上場？個 Peter Mak又走咗去邊？陣前換將？註定大敗！
不過要認住呢班人，人名又改，機構名又改，大話任講，遲啲又做無間道呀！
Something fishy is going on...
...It needs to be watched.
The issue with GH is primarily "doctrinal". When this is not resolved, GH will have no future.
If GH wishes to "continue to serve" the Chinese Church, she has to face this squarely. To come out clearly and cleanly is the only way.
Sorry, Cheung, please remind me again.
Sorry, please remind me again! Thanks.
To Hin
Regarding your questions, there is something I can tell you. Remember what I said how to find me?What happened?
The report of investigation since the end of last year didn't appear as promised but the dissolving of the board came up instead. What happened? Where is the report?
If there are questionable advisors, they should just remove them but not by dissolving the whole board unless the whole board is against them. What happened?
I knew a few advisors in North America requested to have their names removed from the board but their names are still on the list. If they can update news within 24 hours, why can't they remove the names of those advisors who made such a request? What happened?
GH should clarify instead of causing more confusions. GH should provide answer instead of raising more questions for themselves.
