德國裔樞機拉青格（Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger）於香港時間今日凌晨零時左右，獲選為新一任天主教教宗，他選擇「本篤」（Benedict）作為自己的名號，是為本篤十六世。
世界信義宗聯會主席康臣（Mark S. Hanson）及總幹事洛高（Ishmael Noko）立即聯署聲明恭賀新教宗當選，他們祈望本篤十六世在已建立的合一基礎上，繼續促成普世教會的合一。
一九九九九年，若望保祿二世治下的梵蒂岡與世界信義宗聯會簽署《因信稱義》聯合聲明，被視為普世教會合一路上的一個突破。
（取材國際合一新聞社）
（www.christiantimes.org.hk，時代論壇每日快拍，2005.4.20）
Genesis,ch.38: 9,10.根本不是反對避孕的根據
Genesis,ch.38: 9,10.中俄南的受罰,是由於他不肯按舊約規定為哥哥留名傳宗接代.不是由於他進行避孕.而俄南這種避孕根本和現今夫妻避孕的性質完全不同,不可混為一談.
Genesis,ch.38: 9,10.根本不是反對避孕的根據.
加爾文也沒有解錯.
現在絕大多數基督教教會也支持避孕,但異端天主教還大力反對人避孕,害死千萬人!
倪柝聲侵犯婦女後﹐還有人制度新的所為“配搭事奉”﹑“生命樹”﹑“神立僕人”論去阻止對倪柝聲罪行追究﹐天主教不但沒有阻止﹐而且新的條例規定﹐犯一次性罪行就終身不得再任神職。
(倪柝聲根本沒有侵犯過婦女.那是共產黨的誣告.再由梁家麟造謠生事而起.參考"對再批鬥倪柝聲的平議")
(天主教定立過什麼新的條例規定?犯一次性罪行就終身不得再任神職?這規定早前已被梵諦岡正式拒絕.事實上,為新教皇就職按立的一位大主教,正正就是曾犯過嚴重的性侵犯行為而沒報警的惡人.)
基督教今日還希望給犯事的牧師有機會﹐是不是在道德上面落後了﹖
(基督教只給那些真心悔改的犯事牧師有機會,而且這些犯事牧師都曾坐過監受過刑.他們的過去也是信眾知道的.不象異端天主教,閉門造車,不報警,自巳人查自巳人.其實只是包庇性醜聞的借口.)
避孕根本不是“異端”與否的問題。很多反對天主教的基督教會﹐也旗幟鮮明的反對避孕。
(現在絕大多數基督教教會也支持避孕,接受避孕套,預防愛滋病.不要含血噴人了. 避孕雖不是“異端”與否的問題,但這是有關人權和人命的重要問題,因天主教的毒害而受感愛滋病的人有千千萬萬而死.又令人口爆炸.國家貧窮.這和信邪教而受害有何分別?
加爾文時代根本沒有避孕套、避孕丸,那時的醫學知識落后,人口少,又怎可和現在相比?不要胡扯了.)
至於拉青格下令對調查保密﹐是很多機構的做法﹐尤其正在做內部調查﹐是不會隨便公開資料的。
(很多機構的做法?請問什麼機構會調查20年也不報警?
你們還要說謊、包庇罪惡到幾時?如此假冒偽善的惡行,真是令人髮指!
內部調查?這是性侵犯呀!乃刑事案!怎可能會不會公開資料?內部調查20年也不報警?如此黑暗和偽善.真是只得披着羊皮的異端天主教才可如此行.)
To agape: Calvin Opposes Contraception Vigorously
It seems agape is quite ignorant about the fact that Christians throughout the ages until modern times oppose contraception.
In early Christian writings like the Didache (late 1st C) and the the Epistle to Barnabas (2nd C) contraception was treated as murder and this view was commonly shared by all Christians until the Anglicans embraced contraceptive practice in the 1930's.
John Calvin has this to say about contraception in his commentary on the sin of Onan in Gen 38: " Onan not only defrauded his brother of the right due him, but also preferred his semen to putrefy on the ground...The voluntary spilling of semen outside of intercourse between man & woman is a monstrous thing. Deliberately to withdraw from coitus in order that semen may fall on the ground is doubly monstrous. For this is to extinguish the hope of the race and to kill before is born the hoped-for offspring.... If any woman ejects a foetus from her womb by drugs, it is reckoned a crime incapable of expiation, & derservedly Onan incurred upon himself the same kind of punishment, infecting the earth by his semen in order that Tamar might not conceive a future human being as an inhabitant of the earth." Commentaries on the First Book of Moses Called Genesis,ch.38: 9,10.
It should be noted that the editor of the unabridged series of Calvin's Commentaries, published by Baker Book House, has omitted the commentary on these two verses.
agape﹐請你讀“倪柝聲的升黜榮辱”和近期天主教的措施
倪柝聲侵犯婦女後﹐還有人制度新的所為“配搭事奉”﹑“生命樹”﹑“神立僕人”論去阻止對倪柝聲罪行追究﹐天主教不但沒有阻止﹐而且新的條例規定﹐犯一次性罪行就終身不得再任神職。
基督教今日還希望給犯事的牧師有機會﹐是不是在道德上面落後了﹖
避孕根本不是“異端”與否的問題。很多反對天主教的基督教會﹐也旗幟鮮明的反對避孕。
至於拉青格下令對調查保密﹐是很多機構的做法﹐尤其正在做內部調查﹐是不會隨便公開資料的。
教皇有人制衡???
教皇有人制衡???你看看誰能制衡教皇反對避孕?反對神職人員獨身?
李常受是異端,但不可把所有責任推在倪柝聲上.其實和李常受齊名的同工和長老也有好幾位.如陳則信.不過早死罷.而倪柝聲的教會是行長老制.目的就是避免有現在李常受教主的問題出現.
但為什麼李常受的問題會出現,那是由於李常受懂得玩弄權術,大搞個人崇拜,加上邪靈的迷惑,並和其令大量弟兄姊妹跘倒.
但論到搞個人崇拜,異端天主教的教皇無誤也不相伯仲.
同意押比疊對倪柝聲與天主教的比較
同意押比疊對倪柝聲與天主教的比較，並認同倪氏所走的小群治會方法比天主教更危險。教會的領袖甚至比教宗更大，無人制衡。李常受就是一例。
披着羊皮的新教皇包庇罪惡之醜行.
披着羊皮的新教皇包庇罪惡之醜行:
http://www.ccfellow.org/GenericStyles/Content_prayer00.asp?PaperID=0070&ID=19354
拉 青 格 密 函 下 令 主 教 勿 洩 密 閉 門 查 孌 童 涉 礙 司 法
拉 青 格 密 函 下 令 主 教 勿 洩 密 閉 門 查 孌 童 涉 礙 司 法(25/04/05)
【引述自四月廿五日《蘋果日報》】
(表里不一的黑暗政權,假冒偽善的政教合一組織.)
本篤十七世君是天主教的神職人員嗎?可否回應以下的新聞?來證實一下天主教的道德水平如何?
天主教會的道德良心在那裏?To Ken
謝謝你的網頁介紹。我會找時間去看的了。我常常懷疑那些基督教對天主教的指控，有多少是證據確鑿，因為幾年來收看不同反天主教人仕的報導，見到太多道聽途說、個人臆測、無理取鬧，和因為改宗時博取同情而加鹽加醋的指控（指那些改宗基督教的前神父），所以看到這類報導，已不像年少時一味天真地相信，而是「先懷疑後調查」來處理。請你明白。
至於倪柝聲也好、林獻羔也好，他們都沒有經歷過「梵二會議」，也沒有機會查找現代天主教會的改變，所以我敬重他們的為人和靈性，但他們反對天主教的立場對我沒有影響。
（順便一提，雖然我敬重倪氏早期的靈性和事奉，但他後期的「教會改革」，其實比天主教會更危險。因為教宗還有紅衣主教的制衡，地方教會、修會仍有一定的影響力與他對抗。然而，倪氏建立的制度卻是大權獨攬，無人能敵，這制度正是李常受接管教會後出現之種種災難的禍首之一。）
「新聞回顧」
agape不斷將已經被人徹底駁斥的資料重貼又重貼，其毅力實讓人讚歎，但用在有意義的事上會更好。新教皇制定"主耶穌文件"指更正教是假教會,並包庇性醜聞,就叫"真理的合作者"???
|
新教皇拉青格指我們更正教是假教會,即包括聖公會、信義會、宣道會、浸信會等更正教教會都是假教會.只有天主教才是世上唯一的真教會,相信教皇才可完全得救.參下文: http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_910000/newsid_912000/912044.stm | |
新教皇包庇性醜聞:
http://www.ccfellow.org/GenericStyles/Content_prayer00.asp?PaperID=0070&ID=19347
http://www.ccfellow.org/GenericStyles/Content_prayer.asp?PaperID=0070&ID=16555
(這都是異端天主教換湯不換藥.自吹自擂、唯我獨尊的明証.絕不是什麼真理的合作者!)
本篤十六世是真理的合作者
本篤十六世是真理的合作者新舊教皇同樣包庇罪惡和性醜聞!!!
掌教義部 被指阻查教會性醜聞Do Roman Catholics and Evangelical Protestants Now Agree?
Do Roman Catholics and Evangelical Protestants Now Agree?
broadband:
http://www.ankerberg.com/TV/PCA1B.wvx
如是56k,用此连接 :
在因信稱義宣言后,信煉獄、聖母中保、堅持教皇無誤的天主教宣佈更正教不是教會(即假教會)!
|
新教皇拉青格指我們更正教是假教會,即包括聖公會、信義會、宣道會、浸信會等更正教教會都是假教會.只有天主教才是世上唯一的真教會,相信教皇才可完全得救.參下文: http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_910000/newsid_912000/912044.stm | |
 可見天主教根本沒有變,變的只是信義會,愈來愈沒立場.出賣因信稱義福音.最后被天主教宣佈是假教會.可悲乎! |
(corrected message)押比疊不要忘記﹕倪柝聲是反天主教及兩教合一的
從你網頁得知你頗尊重倪柝聲﹐真覺得你應該多留意他這方面的立場﹐“聽聽他意見”。押比疊不要忘記﹕倪柝聲是反天主教及兩教合一的
從你網頁得知你頗尊重倪柝聲﹐真覺得你應該多留意他這方面的立場﹐“聽聽他意見”。
天主教徒非統統滅亡﹐因他們有些真信聖經。可是﹐真拜託你別把愛天主教之情﹐投射到權力中心----教廷和其教皇。 縱使新教徒非完美﹐縱使新教內有你所不屑的“摩法基基”﹐但我可以告訴一個事實﹕今日新教內的摩法基基大都跟你一樣支持天主教。跟你唱反調的反天主教者﹐才是最少摩法基基的一群基督徒。
就算你和你那些反摩法基基朋友都鄙視吳主光﹐也拜託你聽聽胡恩德牧師的觀點。神要就算要你反摩法基基﹐也不會喜悅你反對到要接納異端(天主教)。從你網頁得知你頗尊重倪柝聲﹐或許你應該多留意他這方面的立場﹐“聽聽他意見”。
革新後之天主教教義﹐其“因信稱義”論並非聖經之“因信稱義”
參《教皇在地獄》文末第九段﹐清教徒之心網站(www.apuritansmind.com/ChristianWalk/McMahonPopeJohnPaulIIHell.htm)
The Pope is in Hell
by Dr. C. Matthew McMahon
“ .....As head of the Roman Church, Pope John Paul II also continued the denial of Justification by Faith alone. Now, some Roman Catholics will say they believed in justification by faith alone. But ask them what they mean. Is it analytical or synthetic? In other words, does it depend solely on the merits of Christ and none other, or does it depend on Christ and what you can do as well? Is it imputation or infusion? Does God recognize what He places in you as enough, or do you have to do something more? Is Christ’s work and imputed righteousness the sole cause of salvation, or do you have to earn righteousness as well? The Westminster Confession of Faith says, “Those whom God effectually calleth, he also freely justifieth:[1] not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous; not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone; nor by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them,[2] they receiving and resting on him and his righteousness, by faith; which faith they have not of themselves, it is the gift of God.[3] (1. Rom. 3:24; 5:15-16; 8:30; 2. Rom. 3:22-28; 4:5-8; 5:17-19; 2 Cor. 5:19, 21; Titus 3:5, 7; Eph. 1:7; Jer. 23:6; 1 Cor. 1:30-31; 3. John 1:12; 6:44-45, 65; Acts 10:43; 13:38-39; Phil. 1:29; 3:9; Eph. 2:7-8).” Officially, Pope John Paul II not only denied justification by faith alone, but continued to uphold the official dogma of the Roman Church by Trent’s conclusions – “Canon 10. If anyone says that men are justified without the justice of Christ, whereby he merited for us, or by that justice are formally just, let him be anathema. Canon 12. If anyone says that justifying saith is nothing else than faith in divine mercy, which remits sins for Christ’s sake, or that it is this faith alone that justifies us, let him be anathema. (Translated by Re. H.J. Schroeder, Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent, (Rockford, Tan Books and Publishers, Inc.: 1978) 43.)” Those who reject justification by faith alone are rejecting the only means by which one may be saved. The Bible counters Rome’s blatant misunderstanding and false Gospel, Isaiah 45:25, “In the LORD all the descendants of Israel shall be justified, and shall glory." Luke 18:14, “I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted." Romans 3:24-26, “…being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed, to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.” Romans 3:28, “Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith apart from the deeds of the law.” Romans 5:1, “Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” Romans 5:9, “Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him.” Galatians 3:11, “But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for "the just shall live by faith." Galatians 3:24, “that we might be justified by faith.” William Tyndale said rightly, “But all the texts which show the Pope his duty, he puts out of the way, including all the texts which set the conscience at liberty in Christ, as well as those which prove salvation to be in Christ only. (William Tyndale, Comments on 1 John especially 2:18-19)” As the Bible says -
Romans 8:33, “It is God who justifies.” ...... ”
請千萬別中計
前神父Richard Bennett評福音派與天主教之聯署聲明(ECT 1,2)
前神父Richard Bennett評福音派與天主教之聯署聲明ECT - Evangelicals and Catholics Together
http://www.bereanbeacon.org/bbvid_001.ram
(www.bereanbeacon.org)
前神父Richard Bennett揭發該份聲明在高深精密的學術詞彙背後﹐其本質其實屬於天主教一貫之教義。見於短片18min: 30sec位置﹐例句﹕
“I read ECT 1, it was published in March 1994, and I read exactly what I had taught as a Priest.....and I was horrified that men who called themselves biblical could sign the document and declare that this is biblical truth. For example in ECT 1, it was stated what conversion is, "Conversion is a continuing process, so that the whole life of a Christian should be a passage from death to life, from error to truth." That is the exact teaching of Roman Catholicism....it is confusing sanctification and justification. So we have here a proposal to give to the bible believing world Roman Catholicism.
.....I was even more horrified when ECT 2 came out, because here we have professionalism to the hill﹗ .........We had statement like this, "We agree that justification is not earned by any good works or merits of our own; it is entirely God’s gift, conferred through the Father’s sheer graciousness, out of the love that he bears us in his Son, who suffered on our behalf and rose from the dead for our justification. Jesus was ‘put to death for our trespasses and raised for our justification’ (Romans 4:25). In justification, God, on the basis of Christ’s righteousness alone, declares us to be no longer his rebellious enemies but his forgiven friends, and by virtue of his declaration it is so." We have here again Roman Catholicism. To analyze exactly what they're saying, to take it apart and read it precisely. It's "justification is entirely God's gift conferred" rather than imputed---- the very word that we use to show that we were given inside ourselves the infusion of grace..... the word that allows from mediation of the church that leaves a place so that the church is necessary. The same word that was used in the Council of Trent and Vatican II and in the new catechism. The Roman Catholic Church word that I had been taught again and again! I studied Aquinas for four years and we were taught explicitly that grace is a quality of the soul, and it is conferred through the..... ”
Richard Bennett 呼籲福音派領袖巴刻(J I Packer)等人悔改﹐於26min: 53sec位置﹕
"I cannot believe that some of the men such as J I Packer, who are professional, do not know of Neumann(?) and Henskone(?) and other Catholics who have made the statement that they have produced in the documentation---- man who should what biblical truth is. So we have a truly professionalized document for which we must, before the Holy God, ask that these men repent! ....."
