資料庫 > 網上電台

我在Blog上的惑言

...When I watch the TVB news this evening, I feel even more frustrated. Some injured Illegal workers injured at work, and their employers was sued. The employ simply declare a bankrupt, and now it is the Government who pay the money. A Legco representative of the Labour sector said that the Government should amend the Law, so that Illegal worker could no more sue for a claim in case of injury.

The logic is again, absurd. Isn't it the right that everyone who work should be protected, just because the fact that he is being employed, and the employer should held responsibility? When the employer employ an illegal worker, didn't him acknowledge the risk of doing so? How come an employer could escape from his responsibility just because he had employed an illegal worker? Hong Kong is really a heaven of employer!

I feel very disappointed that such a suggestion is come from a member of a Trade Union, a traditionally Marxist Trade Union. He simply know nothing about "Class Consciousness", but "Trade Union Consciousness". No, it is not even Trade Union Consciousness. It is "Membership consciousness". It is also a "Class Consciousness", yet unfortunately it is not that of Proletariat, but of Bourgeoisie.

See more in http://rseric.tripod.com/blog/

不應該用納稅人的錢鼓勵僱主聘請黑工

必須修改法例要僱佣黑工僱主﹐當黑工死傷負上刑事責任﹐入獄和罰款要重﹐抵銷了他僱佣黑工所得好處。

如果賠償給黑工﹕

1) 對守法而有份在基金供款的僱主不公平

2) 基金如果不夠﹐本地工人不夠錢賠償點算﹖

3) 聘請黑工僱主可以更加放心漠視黑工工作安全﹐因為點死都有“阿公”包底

法例要確保﹐發現黑工﹐有重罰款﹐例如﹕

1) 每個黑工﹑每工作一小時﹐罰$5000 (遠超最低工資時薪)﹐製造阻嚇﹐讓他們得不償失

2) 一旦涉及傷亡﹐僱主有份的公司馬上失去保險保護﹐連帶現在和日後他身為股東﹑負責人的公司全部保險業不接受他們投保

黑工雖然可憐﹐不值得用納稅人的錢去幫﹐他們是明知必死而找性命去拼。最多是慈善團體給點費用給他們辦身後事﹐“安家費”就不要﹐免得你引來大量其他黑工爭住來香港去“死”。

compensation

no, the government should not compensate for the illegal workers. they should take the responsibility of their act.